THE NATION THINKS
DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER IS A PRO-NATALIST CONSPIRACY
By Don Feder
Posted February 27, 2008
According to Kathryn
Joyce, sneer-and-smear artist for The
Nation, those who are concerned about the worldwide decline in birthrates
are – to put it mildly -- racist, neo-Nazis, who have a hidden agenda and (under
the guise of demographic winter) are engaged in our age-old quest to control
women’s bodies.
The Nation is
this nation’s oldest and largest-circulation leftwing journal (outside of The New York Times, of course). Joyce’s
screed, “Missing: The ‘Right’ Babies,” will appear in the March 3 print
edition, but is currently available online.
Joyce believes – with the faith of one immune to facts and
logic – that those sounding the alarm about plummeting fertility rates care only
about the inability of white Europeans to replace themselves. We’re trying to
whip up xenophobia against the continent’s rising Muslim tide. Thus, demographic
winter is the invention of a vast Christian conspiracy to get Europeans to
start making babies again.
Joyce has religion on the brain. (As a child, perhaps she
was bitten by a Gospel singer.)
One
of the grand conspirators cited in her piece, Steve Mosher, is described as “the
president of the Catholic anti-contraception lobbyist group, Population
Research Institute.” Christine de Vollmer of the Latin American Alliance for
the Family is “Catholic activist de Vollmer,” while Austin Ruse is “head of the
ultraconservative Catholic UN lobbyist group C-Fam.”
Not just a Catholic, but an ultra-conservative Catholic? That’s pretty serious.
Joyce further notes that: “The last two popes have involved
themselves in the debate, with John Paul II pronouncing a ‘crisis in births’ in
2002 in an anomalous papal address to
But the conspiracy spans the religious spectrum, making it
all the more sinister, Joyce informs us.
Rick
Stout and Barry McLerran —respectively the director
and the producer of the new documentary “Demographic Winter: the decline of the
human family” – “are among hundreds of Mormon pro-family activists (They’re everywhere. They’re everywhere!) who have made common cause with conservative Catholics and
evangelical ideologues.”
One envisions little Katie as Dorothy in a lefty version of
“The Wizard of Oz,” treading fearfully through a creepy family-values forest whispering:
“Catholics and Mormons and evangelicals – oh, my!”
There’s little to support her fantasies in “Demographic
Winter.” The documentary’s experts are overwhelmingly academics – demographers,
sociologists and a Nobel laureate in economics – from institutions like the
Another focus of Joyce’s paranoia is the World Congress of
Families, which held its fourth Congress in 2007 in
On my two visits to
Joyce finds the World Congress of Families -- a gathering
of pro-family leaders, scholars, activists and parliamentarians – particularly ominous.
She quotes Jennifer Butler (author of “Born Again: The Christian Right Globalized”) who “has tracked the rise of the international
Christian right with apprehension.”
It’s alright for American feminists to use the United
Nations to force the left’s social agenda on the developing world. It’s OK for
“progressives” from this side of the pond to work with the European Union to
advance homosexual rights. But for
If World Congress of Families is the holy alliance pushing
a pro-family agenda, demographic winter is the nativist
wedge issue conspirators are using to drive cosmopolitan Europeans to start
rocking cradles again.
Joyce contends that “the baby-bust,” “the birth dearth,”
and “the graying of the continent” are “modern euphemisms for old-fashioned
race panic as low fertility rates among white ‘Western’ couples coincides with
an increasingly visible immigrant population across
Joyce shamelessly engages in guilt by association, when she
notes that “Mussolini’s fertility project … attacked bachelors, rewarded
mothers of many children, criminalized abortion and banned contraception.” Along
the same lines, she cites Nazi efforts to raise the birth rate in the Third
Reich as a further indictment of advocates of large families.
Of course the Nazis wanted more little Aryans. Wars aren’t
won by nations with shrinking populations. If Roe v Wade and the pill had been around in the 1920s, we would have
been lucky to land a platoon on
The Nazis also wanted to de-populate conquered lands. The
Slavs, who the Nazis despised as untermenchen, were
a special target. To imply that a desire to raise fertility rates is somehow
comparable to Nazism, is like saying that because
We’re
the racists, but they’re the ones flooding the
Speaking
of Nazis, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, their prophetess,
considered non-Aryans “a great biological menace to the future of
civilization.”
Ever
wonder why blacks, who comprise 12% of the population, account for 32% of all
abortions? (For Hispanics, the figures are 13% and 20%.)
Might it have something to do with all of the abortion clinics conveniently located
in inner-city neighborhoods?
The “Demographic Winter” documentary, which Joyce hasn’t
seen, (her critique is based on viewing a 3-minute online trailer) has only the
briefest mention of emigration – as a negative for developing countries, which
are seeing their youth siphoned off to provide labor for the lands of the
childless.
Immigration or emigration has never been a topic of discussion
at a World Congress of Families, which draws participants from Africa, Asia and
Latin America as well as Europe and the
In
less than 40 years, the world’s total fertility rate (the number of children
the average woman will bear in her lifetime), has dropped from 6 to 2.9. By the
middle of this century, worldwide fertility will hit 2.05 – well below
replacement. That forecast is from the United Nations Population Division
(UNPD), which – at last report – had not been co-opted by the vast Catholic-Mormon-evangelical
conspiracy.
More interesting than what’s in The Nation article (innuendo, ad hominem, paranoia) is what’s missing. In a piece running
several thousand words, Joyce mentions exactly one statistic – in paragraph 3, where
she notes that 2.1 children per couple is the “estimated ‘replacement-level
fertility’ for developed nations.” That’s it.
For someone trying to debunk demographic winter, statistics
aren’t just inconvenient; they’re intimidating. So Joyce simply avoids any
discussion of the evidence.
Smart move on her part. How do you
argue away the fact that (again, according to the United Nations) 59 countries
with 44% of the world’s population now have below-replacement fertility?
For the European Union as a whole, the birthrate is 1.5. Population-wise,
the continent is disappearing so fast that even mass immigration can’t save it.
The EU estimates that, if current trends continue, there will be a shortage of
20 million young workers by 2030.
In the face of this looming catastrophe, EU bureaucrats are
engaged in a relentless campaign of promoting same-sex marriage. Ah that “gay
friendly EU.” What is the fertility rate of homosexual couples, anyway?
Back in the real world,
It’s not just
Most
The UN estimates that by 2050 there will
be 248 million fewer children in the world than there are today. Those
children who never were in turn won’t have children of their own, and so on,
leading to accelerating population decline in many areas.
If you’ve decided not to deal with reality, because to do
so might cast doubt on your cherished isms, you don’t have to consider the
consequences of the world that’s coming – a world where the cries of babies and
the laughter of children fade away.
Take
Japan Inc.’s stock soared for a time -- until the Rising
Sun began to shuffle off into the sunset of Banzai Retirement Community. During
the 1990s through 2005, the Japanese stock market fell 80% from its all-time
high. At the same time, the Japanese real estate market lost 60% of its value.
Why has economic decline hit
In 1989, 11.6% of
Throughout
the developed world, the population is growing gray and slow of gait. Today,
20% are over 60 years of age. This is expected to rise to 32% by 2050. UNPD
tells us that then there will be two elderly for every child. Schools will be
turned into nursing homes. Playgrounds will become graveyards.
Among
the questions we’re not supposed to ask are these: How can pensions for a growing
number of retirees be financed by a shrinking
workforce? Who covers their increasingly pricy medical bills? How long before
euthanasia – voluntary and involuntary – becomes universal?
Pity
the average child born in
The Nation is
shorthand for what’s led us here: women and men sacrificing families for
careers (delayed marriage, no marriage, cohabitation), easy divorce, abortion
(each year, worldwide, a woman’s “right to choose” wipes out the equivalent of
the population of Italy), and materialistic lifestyles.
Yet The Nation’s readers sit with their
sterile wombs or male non-reproductive organs, seething because someone
(Catholics? Mormons?), somewhere wonders who’s minding the nursery.
Kathryn
Joyce calls the effort to awaken a slumbering humanity “a ‘clash of
civilizations’ to be fought through women’s bodies, with the maternity ward as
the battleground.” Cute.
Rather than a clash of civilizations, it’s the left’s
worldview against civilization – an old story.
While
they squawk about manmade global warming, and demand sacrifice for the planet,
they rail at those who are trying to warn the sentient beings who inhabit the planet
that their future is increasingly bleak – due not to SUVs but IUDs, and the
rest of a contraceptive, anti-procreation culture.
This article was originally posted at GrassTopsUSA.com